Friday, March 30, 2018

WOMEN AT WAR


Click on any image for a larger version

The Dublin City Library and Archive (DCLA) in Pearse St. have been playing a blinder in recent times, actually over the last thirteen years or so since the tarting up and resourcing of the old (1909) Gilbert Library.

Between talks and exhibitions for the public at large and significant inputs into history research projects and publications, not to mention the archiving of material old and new, the place is a powerhouse of Dublin history.

The latest exhibition deals with women on the home front during WWI and it follows closely on a Suffragette exhibition, both of these making a significant contribution to countering the writing of women out of our glorious past.

So let's go in and have a look.



Needless to say, women started into the war in their "traditional" roles in society. They, no more than anyone else, had no idea of how their lives and future roles were to be eventually changed by this continental convulsion.



The exhibition traces the roles they played on the home front while many of their menfolk were away fighting for the King against the Kaiser.

Their activities at home were subsequently downplayed in the male history of the day, but the seeds that were sown in this period eventually grew up through the tangled undergrowth and today's world, had they seen it eventually come to pass, would surely have cheered them up.

I say that though, on reflection, I'm not sure that this would in fact be the case. There's still a long way to go.



This poster is typical of the use of women by the authorities to shame the men into going to war. Poor little (Catholic) Belgium is seen in flames with only a small area of sea between it and the home shore. Taken in tandem with other propaganda messages, this one appeals on more than one level.

What man would leave it up to his woman to go to war in is place? What will happen if the hated Bosch are not stopped? Next thing they'll be on the home shore and your family will be tortured and killed.



And if that didn't work, look at what the hated Bosch did to that lovely nurse Cavell.

I have to say I was familiar with Edith Cavell's name from having seen her statue in London many many years ago, but I had no idea that she had been executed for treason, of all things. That took me aback as she wasn't German. But apparently the Germans had conjured up a bespoke definition of treason which included helping the enemy no matter who you were, where you did it, or where you are from.

Would have saved a lot of paperwork in the case of Roger Casement. And him coming to mind brought up a British inconsistency that I must get to the bottom of sometime: they hanged Casement; shot the 1916 leaders; and refused to shoot Wolfe Tone. Funny old world.



But back to the women. On 9 June 1918, designated as Lá na mBan, and in the days following, thousands of women all over the country signed an anti-conscription pledge where, as well as indicating their opposition to conscription, they undertook not to do any of the work left undone by the men should these be conscripted.

Granted, this was well into the war and, unlike at the begining, its effects were being felt and such glory as there might have been at the beginning had dissipated. Then there had also been the Rising and its consequences.

So the poster above stands in stark contrast to that further up above which attempted to use women to leverage the men to join up.



However, a lot of men had joined up. Some for idealistic reasons, little Belgium and all that. But others had joined for a steady income for their family. And yet others had been suckered into volunteering at the end of a late night's drinking in the pub.

I'm told my grand-uncle, John Burgess, was in the last of the above categories. His joining up didn't make a lot of sense. He was married with at least two and a half children; he was well fixed working in his father's successful shoemaking business which he was about to inherit on his father's impending retirement.

When he enlisted, his father evicted his wife and children from the "company house" in Kilmainham and banished them to a wee box house across the river on Oxmantown Road. I'd say she well needed the separation women's allowance at that stage.



The allowance, which was paid to women whose men had enlisted, evoked many reactions on the home front. The Republican movement opposed the allowance on the grounds, inter alia, that it was irresponsibly squandered by the recipients.

There was mention of drunkeness, idleness and loose morals and the National Union of Women Workers established Irish Women's Patrols, reminiscent of the rural Parish Priest with his shillelagh scouring the ditches for misbehaving couples.



Cumann na mBan were active throughout this period and the exhibition features a book of poetry from Maeve Cavanagh, Sheaves of Revolt, which decried the enlistment of Irishmen into the British Army, was stridently anti-British and was suppressed by the authorities.

Maeve was the sister of Ernest Cavanagh who did memorable cartoons for Jim Larkin's Irish Worker. He was shot on the steps of Liberty Hall during the Rising.



A fine picture of Kathleen Clarke, widow of Tom Clarke, who was a founder member of Cumann na mBan and who served on the City Council with my grand-uncle PJ Medlar, finally knocking Alfie Byrne off his pedestal in 1939 to become the first female Lord Mayor of Dublin City, and that in an election in which Alfie actually cast two votes for her.

When my friend, Felix Larkin, pointed out this wonderful electoral anomaly to me, it reminded me that Albert Reynolds had signed the articles establishing the European Bank for Reconstruction (EBRD) twice and my grandfather signed his 1901 census form twice - all legit and by the book.



An unusual photo of Constance Markievicz, far right. Founder member of Cumann na mBan, sentenced to death for her part in the Rising, first woman elected to the British House of Commons and first woman in the world to become a Cabinet Minister.



Monica Roberts was a young woman who set up a voluntary organization, ‘The Band of Helpers to the Soldiers’ to provide gifts for Irish troops at the front, particularly those serving with the Royal Dublin Fusiliers and the Royal Flying Corps.

Many soldiers wrote to thank Monica and a correspondence then developed. These poignant letters give vivid pen-pictures of conditions at the Western Front and reveal the courage of troops in the face of appalling circumstances.



An ID certificate issued in London with a permit for Monica to travel (return to) Ireland within three months.



A general observation about the exhibition. This is one of a number of recent exhibitions drawing on archives and collections held by the DCLA, including some only recently acquired - Dublin Fusiliers, Jacobs Biscuits, Monica Roberts.

Senior Archivist Ellen Murphy has responsibility for these archives and for this and recent exhibitions. She is doing a marvellous job both behind the scenes in sorting out the archives and then organising their presentation in the exhibitions.

The current exhibition draws on the three archives mentioned and it is encouraging to see how these sources complement each other and contribute to building up a wider picture. Ellen's head must be filling up at a rate of knots of late but it is all grist to the mill.

While I'm at it I'd like to congratulate Monica in the Council's Irish Language Unit on her recent promotion. I have commented on her creative use of the Irish language both in the Jacobs and in the current exhibition. Her good fortune will be the Unit's loss.

Sunday, March 25, 2018

LOCAL HISTORY DAY - MARCH 2018


Click on any image for a larger version

This event in the Dublin City Library and Archive in Pearse St. is becoming ever more popular not only with audiences but with speakers. This is a very encouraging trend. As I never tire of repeating to people, outlets like this not only promulgate the results of existing research but stimulate people to do further research in the knowledge that the results will have a platform.

For those who are not professionals in the game, it ensures that their work will be up to the highest standards, not only in content but also in presentation.

I think it was mentioned that this is the thirteenth year of this event which would have its existence coincide with the explosion in local history over that period. Much more than a coincidence I imagine.



Enda Leaney

This session, the first of two scheduled for this year, took place on 24/3/2018.

I nearly had a paper on the agenda myself but in deference to the plethora of aspiring speakers I was happy to settle for the second session in November next, and even further ahead if there is any danger of me squeezing anyone out.

I was thinking of a paper looking at some of the deaths in my family against the wider national background of when they occurred. I have infant deaths, drownings, war, TB and even a potential double mercury poisoning.

However, I am now contemplating putting that one off for a while and instead introducing the story of Edward Ball who murdered his mother in Booterstown in 1936. We'll see.

Enda, who is running these sessions, had his hands full this time round. The queue of speakers meant reducing presentations from forty five to thirty minutes, skipping lunch, and postponing any Q&A until the end of the session. I'm not sure if this will be the new template or is just a temporary response to the current profusion of riches.


Starting a Local History Group.
James Madigan, Liberties Cultural Association



James Madigan

James took the line of advise by example. He sketched the brief history of the formation and success to date of the Liberties Cultural Association.

From a small coffee group beginning, it is now organising very successful tours/walks in the area. Core group members bring varied sets of skills to the table. They have eschewed a written constitution as being too restrictive and likely to dampen the spontaneity and enthusiasm of members, That enthusiasm was palpable in James's presentation.

The name and the logo were the subject of much debate and the result achieves both inclusiveness and historical resonance.

I have a particular interest in the Liberties (outer reaches in James's St.) where my great grandfather was a master bootmaker and where my granny was born (up at the Fountain).


Closure of an Unremunerative Railway Line: Harcourt Street to Bray, 1958.
James Scannell, The Old Bray Society



James Scannell

James gave us the rundown on the Harcourt street line, from its opening to its closure and substitution by the crazy 86 bus route which staggered all over the place on its way to and from town. He took us through some of the many accidents on the line and the plight of the unfortunates who were seen to have caused them.

You could sense his sorrow and frustration at the withdrawal of the Drumm battery trains, and, indeed, at the closure of the line, most of which is, ironically, now back on the rails, so to speak.

I have memories of the No.15 bus on its way into town from Terenure. Passengers passing Terenure church blessed themselves, a common reflex in those days. Then again passing Rathgar church and again passing Rathmines church and yet again passing Harcourt Street Station. It's amazing what an imposing frontage will do to your subconscious.


The Meeting at Rochestown Avenue, 1884 and related history.
Thomas Burke, Local History Alumni Group



Thomas Burke

Tom sounded like he was building up to a bloody confrontation in Rochestown Avenue with his account of preparations for the big National League meeting there in 1884.

The Orangemen were making elaborate plans to attack the meeting from two sides. One crowd coming straight out from town and the Bray crowd trekking up from Killiney Station. The venue was on the borderline between the jurisdictions of the DMP and the RIC and both forces were highly mobilised for the event.

However, we were denied what appeared inevitable bloodshed by the weather and some Protestant good sense. So the epic tale turned into a shaggy dog story but not before it had got us all going.

Another item in which I had a great interest as I used to live just down the road from Rochestown Avenue.


“Dear Miss B” – a Collection of Edwardian Postcards.
Brian McCabe, Kill History Group



Brian McCabe

Brian was great entertainment with a sample from his collection of Edwardian postcards from around 1909/11. He had the audience in stitches betimes.

The postcards were all addressed to the same lady who appeared to be in service to a much traveling Lord. So the destinations were varied and interesting. The brevity of expression stimulated our imagination and some of the banalities rang loud bells - trust you are all keeping well, no news here.

Brian has produced a little book of some of his cards and I look forward to going through it when I finish this post.


An Irish Country House in Cloyne, Co. Cork.
Marie Guillot, Cloyne Literary & Historical Society



Marie Guillot

Marie has achieved the magnificent feat of living in Cork for the last twenty years and not picking up the slightest trace of a local accent.

I didn't think I'd have much interest in this item as big houses and their various accoutrements tend to leave me cold. But Marie's enthusiasm and her careful tracing of the evolution over the last three centuries of Kilcrone House in Cloyne had my rapt attention.

Each new family added a bit and the old pile just growed over the years. Marie had done a mountain of research, not forgetting her intensive personal interrogation of one of the former maids.

I took it from what she said that she is now living in the house, though I may be mistaken. Her evident pain at the work of some of the local jerry-builders in the house's distant history makes me feel I might have heard right.


Lesser Known Dubs – The Good, the Bad and the Downright Despicable.
Ken Finlay, The Old Dublin Society



Ken Finlay

Ken Finlay is no stranger to Dublin history. He's been at it for years and has published all over the place. What he was giving us here were snippets on some of Dublin's less well known characters.

He started with Charles Cameron, who profoundly affected the life of the city and that for the better. Cameron became the city's medical officer in 1876 and, as Ken pointed out, being a polymath he was able to rise above the silly preoccupations of the time and see the wider picture. I think of him as a major contributor to the emergence of epidemiology. He was one of the good guys.

Ken he went on to Frank Dubedat. From a well got Huguenot family, he let them down by scarpering with a load of his client's dosh. He was presumably a bad guy.

And then there was Leonard McNally who turned informer on the 1798 crowd. He was presumably a despicable guy.

Ken had got through just a few more off his long list when time ran out.


My Experience as a Dublin Docker 1963-2009.
Thomas Walsh, Dublin Dock Workers Preservation Society



Thomas Walsh


Thomas Walsh's contribution was riveting, so much so that he's been booked for an encore at the next session.

His description of his life as a docker was not only a personal testimony, it was a significant contribution to the not-so-glorious history of the city port.

He explained how hard and precarious was the life of a docker. The work was backbreaking at the best of times. There was the constant danger of serious accident which could end a career and deprive a family of the breadwinner. There were health hazards such as the handling of asbestos.

And then there was the inequality of the button system which created a permanent and hereditary elite, the button men. You can see examples of buttons in the photo above. Eventually, the Port Authority took over directly employing the dockers, so work, or at least remuneration, was spread over a wider pool.

But that was not the end of the story. Despite prolonged resistance from the dockers mechanisation and containerisation put paid to most of the jobs.

Just on a personal note: he mentioned a union/button meeting in Coláiste Mhuire. I assume that was in the halla. The whole complex there is scheduled for redevelopment, including where a meeting of nationalist groups took place in 1914 to start planning the 1916 Rising. I hope the new building will respect the site's historic past.

I'm looking forward to Part 2 in November.



irishhistoryonline.ie – a Resource for Local History Groups.
Jacqueline Hill, NUI Maynooth



Jacqueline Hill

Jacqueline's contribution was short and straightforward. Irish History Online is a mammoth bibliography of Irish history and if local historians want to be in it they will have to ensure that their journals are captured by the system. One way of doing his would be to be sure to comply with current copyright legislation regarding legal deposit.

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

ANNE BIEŻANEK


Anne Bieżanek leaving Westminister Cathedral
after confronting Archbishop Heenan on 1 May 1964.
Click on any image for a larger version

I would just like to add a postscript to the recent International Women's Day (8 March 2018). It concerns one of my heroes, Anne Bieżanek.

She was a great woman and a formative influence.

She was a Roman Catholic doctor and married woman who opened a birth control clinic in Liverpool in the early 1960s. She was refused communion at her local church and only succeeded in receiving the sacrament when she took herself to the altar rails at Westminster Cathedral and outfaced Archbishop Heenan (as he then was). You can see her leaving the church after that confrontation in the photo above.



She then wrote a book which was in two parts. The first part detailed her efforts to set up her birth control clinic (St. Anthony of Padua) and her brushes with the RC church. The second part set out the history of the RC church's second class treatment of women down the ages.



Click on image for a larger version


The book, which was a Pan paperback, was banned in Ireland (under the contraceptive schedule). I requested a permit from the Department of Justice to import a copy, and, much to my amazement, actually got one. You can see a copy above.

I have referred to Anne a number of times since.

I did a short blog post when I discovered in 2012 that she had died a little over a year earlier.

Then, in February, Four Courts Press were canvassing on Twitter for people's female heroes and I put her forward. I didn't get either of the two prize volumes but at least she got an airing.

I then got to wondering to what extent she was remembered across the channel. I suspected not very much. But working out of the newspaper cutting on her death, and with the help of Google, I traced her grand-daughter and wrote to her to say her grand-mother was not entirely forgotten on this side of the channel.

I have just got a lovely reply from her explaining that she had always loved and admired her grand-mother but that it was only as she grew up and had a family herself that she came to realise the full extent and significance of her grand-mother's bravery and her achievement.

It is heartwarming to read her admiration and praise for her gran.



At prayer


Anne Bieżanek was a pioneer and a person of integrity and deserves to be remembered.

PHOTOS

The photos above are from the newspaper and the internet but there are six photos in the book itself and you can see these below.









Saturday, March 17, 2018

JOUTES ORATOIRES


Statue de Louis Pasteur, cour de la Sorbonne
pendant les événements de mai 1968
Photo: Philippe Gras
Click on any image for a larger version

When I saw the notice in the Alliance Française newsletter for this Oratorical Jousting final (16/3/2018) I made up my mind there and then to go along. It was actually the final round in an interschools debating contest in the French language. More than 30 schools in the Leinster area had participated and the final was between Coláiste Íosagáin and Loreto on the Green. Two girls' schools, as it turned out.

I arrived a little early and decided to have a coffee in the Alliance café, La Cocotte. However the café was just closing when I arrived but they let me look around the current exhibition of photos by the late Philippe Gras. And what did I see among them but the one at the top of this post. The theme is freedom of expression and the photo was taken during the 1968 student uprising in Paris.

So what, you might say? But bear with me. The subject of the night's debate upstairs in the new mediathèque was LA LIBERTÉ D'EXPRESSION N'EST NI POSSIBLE NI SOUHAITABLE - freedom of expression is neither possible nor desirable. How apt, though I don't recall any of the contestants mentioning 1968. Both the French Revolution (1789) and the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) got a few airings in the course of the night.

I had gone along with the intention of taking a few photos and doing a blog post if the night proved interesting. However I gathered the organisers were "wary of social media" which was a bit of a surprise, so I just determined to sit and listen and think.

The night did turn out to be very interesting so I decided to write it up anyway. I'm sure there will be plenty of photos on the Alliance site from the official photographer in due course.

I found the format of the debate intriguing.

I had taken part in the Gael Linn interschools debates in Irish in the 1960s. In those debates you only got the subject twenty minutes in advance. This was way before the internet so you had to rely on your wits and what was already in your head. You had three minutes to present your case. The teams as such did not take sides for or against the motion, that was left to the individuals themselves. Individuals' marks were then combined to give a team total.

In the French case, the subject is known well in advance though I'm not sure when sides are allocated. In any event there is plenty of time for preparation, deciding tactics, and deciding which points would be made by which team member. Don't forget that in this case a coherent case has to be made by the team as a whole.

An interesting variation in the French case is that for a specified period within the three minutes the speaker can be challenged by a member of the opposing team and there follows a spontaneous, and lively, debate between the two contestants until the adjudicator feels that that the point has been exhausted or the exchanges have gone on long enough. This is a interesting variation as, given that the main contributions have been prepared and well rehearsed in advance, it allows the contestants' spontaneous mastery of the language to be put to the test. It also tests their resilience under fire.



Handout: teams on the night & best speakers from previous rounds.
Click image for a larger version

My impression was that the teams were very well matched. Well they would be, wouldn't they. having come through a fair few rounds in this knockout competition

I thought Loreto were more at home in their French though I thought they had the harder side of the argument to defend - promoting untrammeled free speech (and yes Charlie Hebdo got a mention). They were sort of caught in a bind as the opposing team in their opening shot had defined free speech as unlimited freedom of expression and had gone on to argue for reasonable restraints. This put Loreto in the position of arguing in favour of being allowed "to shout fire in a cinema" as it were. Assuming I understood correctly what was going on.

Coláiste Íosagáin had, for their part, defined themselves into a defensible middle ground. I also felt that they had marshalled and structured their arguments better as a team.

If I had one general remark to make it would be that the contestants spoke a little too fast. I know, from my own experience, that you tend to do that when you are nervous and the native French do speak at a rate of knots. Nevertheless.

The advice we were given at the time by the adjudicator was: If you don't feel your speaking too slow, then you're speaking too fast. I'm sure many public speakers, at least the more thoughtful among them, would identify with that. Though when you observe this for a while it becomes second nature.

I'd say the jury found it a very close call in the end as the standard was high all round.



French Ambassador Stéphane Crouzat with Team Íosagáin

Coláiste Íosagáin emerged the winner. Bravo.

I don't know the marking system and, unlike in my case, the jury didn't give any analysis of how they arrived at their decision. I must keep an eye out for this contest next year and maybe talk to a few people in advance.

Below is Sadhbh Ní Ghráda from the winning team. Her father was a classmate of mine in the middle of the last century.


Sadhbh Ní Ghráda with parents Cormac & Máire

The debates have their own website where you can link to the rules and other background material.

Wednesday, March 14, 2018

IRELAND


CONSTITUTION OF IRELAND - ARTICLE 4
The name of the State is Éire, or, in the English language, Ireland.
And so it was with great pleasure that I learned of the outcome of our persistence in joining the Common Market under our proper name IRELAND. We had been called many things in our day and Ireland was only one of them.

I was very conscious of this little victory, particularly in my dealings with the EEC, and it always gave me a lift to see Ireland, tout court, on our country nameplate at meetings.

I eventually got the opportunity to make my own contribution during the negotiations setting up the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in 1990.

We had been specified among the signatories in the draft agreement as Republic of Ireland. I explained that that was the soccer team and the entry was quickly changed. The hard lifting had already been done by those before me.

However, something came up in conversation recently that pulled me up short. The 1948 Republic of Ireland Act seemed to have a different story:

REPUBLIC OF IRELAND ACT 1948 - ARTICLE 2
It is hereby declared that the description of the State shall be the Republic of Ireland.
So was Republic of Ireland kosher all along and did I not have a leg to stand on, other than precedent and a bit of brass neck.

And what is the difference between Ireland being the name of the State and Republic of Ireland being its legally mandated description. The 1948 act says shall and not may.

This was really very confusing so I threw the problem at some of my learned friends. No, not lawyers, just learned.

Felix Larkin, drawing on his nuanced understanding of our nation's modern history and his intimate involvement with the postal service, came up with an explanation which at least exposed the underlying motivation for the "change".
Can I add another layer of confusion? Commemorative stamps issued in 1949 and 1950 carried the legend "Poblacht na hÉireann" and, with one exception, they also carried the legend "Republic of Ireland". Before 1949 it was "Éire", as it has been since 1952 (no commemorative stamp was issued in 1951). I assume this was simply the First Inter-party Government trying to rub Dev's nose in it - in other words, that they had secured the Republic in the 1948 Act, and he hadn't.

That all made perfect sense, up to a point. They couldn't change the name without a constitutional referendum so they tried a bit of sleight of hand with a piece of legislation.

The idea of description was introduced, so our name was still Ireland but you now had to refer to, or call?, us Republic of Ireland.


As Felix said, we were briefly described on our stamps as Republic of Ireland, but we soon returned to Ireland in English, though the stamps only use the Irish language version Éire.

However, we are apparently still operating under confusing and opposing legal/constitutional instructions. I wonder will we have to wait till 2048 for it to be sorted out.

When I say we I'm using it as a sort of royal plural denoting the nation. I won't be around then but some of yous might.



Just in case I've inadvertently added to your confusion, you might like to recap with this extract from Wikipedia which I subsequently came across.


On stamps, the name of the state has always been written in Irish and rarely also written in English. The overprints were stamped first Rialtas Sealadach na hÉireann ("Provisional Government of Ireland") and later Saorstát Éireann ("Irish Free State"). Subsequent stamps nearly all used the name Éire ("Ireland"), even though this was not the name of the state until the 1937 Constitution took effect. The exceptions were issued in 1949 and 1950, and used POBLAĊT NA hÉIREANN or Poblacht na h-Éireann ("Republic of Ireland"). This phrase is the official description of the state specified in the Republic of Ireland Act, which came into force in April 1949; the state's name was not changed by the Act. Fianna Fáil defeated the outgoing government in the 1951 election and abandoned the use of the description, reverting to the name on stamps and elsewhere. Originally, Éire was written in Gaelic type; from 1952 to 1979, many stamps had the name of the state in Roman type, usually in all caps, and often written EIRE rather than ÉIRE, omitting the síneadh fada accent over the initial 'E'. In 1981 the Department of Posts and Telegraphs recommended the inclusion of the word "Ireland" along with "Éire" on stamps but the Department of the Taoiseach vetoed the idea on the basis it could cause "constitutional and political repercussions" and that "the change could be unwelcome."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postage_stamps_of_Ireland#Name_of_state